Another Ghost Story That Didn’t Make the Book

sbsmall
I came across a few letters in the Duke Parapsychology Lab archives about a haunting in Virginia at a place called the Oakland Farm School. The letters were dated 1964 and they written to Gaither Pratt (a scientists at the lab) from Margaret Shepherd, who had founded the school on her family’s farm.

I looked into the story a little and for various reasons decided not to include it. The Parapsychology Lab didn’t investigate the case and although Gaither Pratt did later, when he was at the University of Virginia, he didn’t seem to think it was a strong case.

It’s not that Gaither doubted any of the accounts of what had happened there, but there was little he could do after the fact. He visited the farm once with parapsychologist Bill Roll, who was looking into the disturbances on behalf of the Psychical Research Foundation.  Bill Roll had British psychic Douglas Johnson with him. Among other things, Johnson said he could hear a woman sobbing, and when he looked out a window he said he saw men going below ground, where there used to be an icehouse they later learned, and when the men came back up they were carrying a coffin.  Johnson also kept getting the name Lily, which was the name of the grandmother who had given the Shepherds the farm.  From Gaither’s point of view there was no way of knowing if Johnson had gotten his information from the dead or the minds of the living via ESP.

There’s a small write-up of the haunting in a book Gaither wrote with Naomi Hintze called The Psychic Realm.  In many ways it sounds like a classic haunting: the distant sounds of music and a party were heard on several occasions (The Shining!) and foot steps, often heard walking down empty hallways and up to doors in the middle of night. In Unbelievable, I talk about how the lab discovered that ghosts, (or whatever is responsible for the phenomena) are seen more than heard, and this seems to be true here, although a few times when there was no one there to have made them foot prints were found in traces of pollen or plaster dust.

shepherd
What stood out for me was Margaret Shepherd’s description of a photograph of a dead child that she found hanging on a wall when she was visiting the farm for the first time, after her husband’s grandmother had given it to them as a wedding present.  It was in a room on the first floor that had the “seldom-used look of an old-fashioned parlor.”

“Over the mantel, black braided hair made a frame around the picture of a dead child, a little girl about six or seven. The young face with its closed eyes was lovely.  The dark hair was long and flowing, as if it had been carefully brushed.”

“Someone told me that the child had died of diphtheria in this house.  I knew that in those days it was not unusual for families to have made photographs of children in death, since often they had no other likenesses of them.  That picture fascinated me.  How much they must have loved her!  I had a strong sense of identity with that little girl.  For a long time afterward I dreamed of her.”

I would have been the same.  And had I decided to fully research this story I would have begun with that photograph.  Where was it now?  Who was that little girl exactly?  Ha. Okay, now I want to research this story!

Although Gaither was not keen about the case, he did say that he felt ghosts were more common than we ordinarily suppose.  “As a scientist, I want to know, if it is possible to find out, what it all means.  What is the reality back of these experiences and of the thousands of others of a similar kind?”

He says that he shares Dr. Eisenbud’s opinion, which was quoted at the beginning of the piece.

“I am inclined to believe that they [ghosts] occur more frequently than is generally allowed, and are simply kept in the family closet, which, in our culture, is by all odds the safest place for aberrant creatures of this sort.”

The picture above is not the photograph Margaret described.  It’s from Sleeping Beauty: Memorial Photography in America, a book of photographs from Dr Stanley B. Burns, who has been collecting these kinds of photographs for years. The second photograph is of Margaret Shepherd and I got it from the website for Oakland School, which is still in operation today.

My June 28 Presentation

presentation
Okay, I’m plugging my own event. It’s on June 28, at 3:00 pm and I’ll be giving a presentation about my book and the Duke Parapsychology Laboratory at:

Polaris North Theatre
245 West 29th St, 4th Floor
$15 in advance.
$20 at the door.

Please call 646-373-6868 for more info or go here.

If you went to my book event at the Open Center, this one is going to be very similar. It will be somewhat more in depth, but if you went to that one, don’t go to this one. It will feel too much the same, I think.

But if you didn’t go, by all means you should go to this one if you’re into this subject! I worked hard on the presentation, pulling out some of the best stories and pictures I have, and I found out things even the people who worked there didn’t know.

(That’s me at the Open Center in the picture above.)

The Duke Building Which Housed the Lab

I love doing then and now shots, but the Duke University Campus is so unchanged! This was the West Duke Building which housed the lab then:

westdukebldg

And this is the building now:

dukenow2

A view from the other side then, where they always took their yearly group shots:

1946

And the other side now (I know, the shots aren’t really comparable):

dukenow1

Finally, here is a shot of the building they into moved across the street on Buchanan Boulevard, after Rhine retired and Duke closed the lab. I can’t find my now shot! But I assure you it’s pretty unchanged as well.

buchananblvd

The Original Duke Psychology Department

I was excited to find this picture when I went back down to Durham. From left to right: J. B. Rhine, (head of the Duke Parapsychology Lab) Don Adams (psychology professor, tried to sabotage the lab, but felt remorse about it later) Karl Zener, (psychology professor, designed the ESP cards that the lab made famous, and joined in Adams in trying to bring down the lab) William Stern, (psychology professor, invented the concept of IQ) I don’t know who this guy was, and Helge Lundholm, (psychology professor who, with Adams and Zener, tried to get William McDougall, the head of the psychology department, to do something drastic about J. B. Rhine and his Parapsychology Laboratory).

dukepsych

Parapsychology Foundation Lecture Tonight

leshan
I wish I had thought of posting this before, but I’m going to this lecture tonight that is part of the Parapsychology Foundation’s Perspectives Lecture series.

Dr. Lawrence LeShan will be launching his New Book, A New Science of the Paranormal: The Promise of Psychical Research and the PF will be launching the Helix Press Reprint of Allan Angoff’s Eileen Garrett and the World Beyond the Senses (which I used in my research of Eileen Garrett).

The details:  

Tonight, June 4th, 7 – 9pm, at Baruch College Newman Conference Center in Room H763 on the 7th Floor at 151 East 25th Street in Manhattan.

Telepathy From DARPA’s Point of View

Previously I posted that while physicist Michio Kaku has written that telepathy is theoretically possible, how Kaku imagines telepathy is very different from how they saw it at the Duke Parapsychology Laboratory.

A few recent articles in WIRED about research into telepathy being conducted at DARPA (The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) and elsewhere describe a direction similar to what Kaku described in his book Physics of the Impossible (if I’m remembering what I read correctly).  The main difference is J. B. Rhine and the scientists at the lab thought telepathy was non-physical, and the scientists conducting the research in these articles believe it’s a product of the brain.  I think Rhine would say what they’re looking at is not telepathy but can perhaps mimic it to some extent.  (Just a guess on my part.)

The articles I’m talking about are Pentagon Preps Soldier Telepathy Push, and Darpa: Heat + Energy = Brains. Now Make Us Some.

The picture below is another ESP machine built at the Parapsychology Laboratory.

coxmachine

Edgar Cayce

cayce
I’ve been asked in interviews about J B. Rhine’s opinion of psychic Edgar Cayce. I didn’t really research this a lot. But I did learn that at one point Upton Sinclair had suggested that the lab study Edgar Cayce. Rhine was less than enthusiastic.

They’d gone to Virginia Beach once  to test Cayce, Rhine told Sinclair, and Cayce charged them $25 per trial (and he missed), plus $40 for medicines only Cayce’s supply housed. Nonetheless, Rhine said they were planning another test when Cayce died.

When I went back to Duke in March I came across a March 3, 1966 letter where Rhine made a statement about Cayce.

“There is no reliable information, so far as I know, of any other source for the late Mr. Edgar Cayce’s statements, made in what is claimed to have been an unconscious state, than Mr. Cayce’s mind itself.  I would not want to put any confidence in the claims that this information came from other sources.  To determine that it did would require a much more carefully controlled study than was made during Mr. Cayce’s life time.

“Our own researches has led us to the working hypothesis that everyone has some potential psi (psychic)  ability such as has been claimed for Mr. Cayce, but that Mr. Cayce had more than the average person has, as I have said,  not been satisfactorily proved so far as I know.

“Naturally I cannot and would not want to say that Mr Cayce did not possess unusual psi ability, but I would insist with strong emphasis that it is not responsible to make a cult out of belief in these powers in an individual without the careful scientific study of the claims that were available throughout Mr. Cayce’s lifetime.”